while I'm at it

| | Comments (7) | TrackBacks (0)
Speaking generally, what is worse for you: A pint of lager or a pint of Coke?

From: AQA [63336]

AQA thinks Coke. Coke has approximately 240 calories and sugar, whereas a pint of an average strength beer only has 164 calories per pint.

Hmm...I guess I meant "Is the poisoning effect of alcohol on my liver better or worse for me than whatever is bad in Coke?" but, y'know, this makes me feel slightly better. On topic, I was reading Does Anything Eat Wasps? the other day, which is a collection of interesting questions submitted to New Scientist over the years. One of them was about whether you could live on beer alone. It said there'd never been any serious studies undertaken on the matter, but did note that in the 1800's they sent three ships from England to Australia- two without beer, the third with. The ships without beer showed up in Aus with nearly 100 men requiring hospitalization. The boat with the beer? Six. Maybe Guiness really is good for you.

That said, I'm currently in a self-imposed month of sobriety. This is a yearly tradition that I undertake immediately after my birthday. Sort of a 'get clean after Christmas binge' kind of thing. It's good for saving money and spending more time at the gym. Bad for dating.

Hilariously, here's a blog entry from a guy who decided to replace beer with water for a day...

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: while I'm at it.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://mt4.sevitz.net/mt-tb.cgi/4766

7 Comments

Which is an admirable habit, if not really annoying one. (The month of not drinking foolishness)

Also you probably can drink more beer than coke, which would make beer worse for you again.

That reminds me of a programme I saw (probably on Discovery) about how shortly after the middle ages in London people drank beer instead of water, because it was sterile, and the average daily consumption of beer in Britain at that time was about the same as the average yearly consumption of beer in Britain today. Crazy, eh?

I don't think it was London people as much as Europe.

No, it was definitely London. The guy (it was Mark Williams from the Fast Show) said 'London'. It was definitely London. And it was definitely Discovery Channel.

Definitely, definitely... you remind me of a young autistic Dustin Hoffman...

Well done on picking that up! It was entirely intentional, of course, definitely intentional...

I would question the accuracy of that.

Daily Links

Twitter

    Follow me at twitter

    Flickr

    Blogroll

    Pages

    Geek Engine

    sevitzdotcom logoThis is a sevitzdotnet production ©. Template slicing, pain, suffering, and development by Adrian Sevitz. Tech. support and maintance done with love and for some change found down the back of the sofa.
    Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

    About this Entry

    This page contains a single entry by Danzor published on March 7, 2006 3:05 PM.

    This is incredibly cool! was the previous entry in this blog.

    descent is the next entry in this blog.

    Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.